"If followed closely, a person's interaction with the conversation network can be used to uniquely identify that person over time. If such monitoring is known to well-meaning interlocutors productive adaptation can occur. Not so well-meaning actor's stream history can then be compared with a view to rapid, even near real-time, vetting in the future."
To say that there was a clear expectation of a protective cacoon was a foregone conclusion. Authenticity is that valuable. Direct public declarations of such can work against organic efficiency. Subtle, in this case, is strategic.
"I don't understand."
"Its enough that you tried. Namaste'."
NOTE: Some of the foregoing in this BuzzTheHill post is not fictional. Consider it a public disclosure and as such, to the degree something novel and not obvious to those skilled in the art has been addressed, the specific intent was/is to put it in the PUBLIC DOMAIN.
© 2011 Buzz Hill
No comments:
Post a Comment