Friday, May 6, 2011


"It is fair to say that my untimely demise or disappearance would automatically trigger disclosure.  But know that there are other events that control the mechanism as well. Its a dynamic protocol revised frequently. Why do you ask?"

Testing the waters?
"Big ego, deep pockets. President?"

"No not him. The other guy. Campaign for a write-in candidacy or something. A clear choice between candidates that have a very different view of what makes our country better."

Is deception based policy sustainable? If so, one candidate seems to stand out. How might supporters use a variety of skill sets to game the systems available to biggest advantage?

If the opportunity exists, ignore questions that do not support the private agenda designed behind closed doors. If necessary, avoid 'dialogue' that cannot be tightly controlled. Carefully craft and obscure legal disclaimers (small print).  Create the illusions of dialog and productive conversations.

Clandestine operations are preferred wherever possible. Consider them the default case when applicable.

"You know what's funny? The deceivers have a hard time keeping it straight who we are talking about. They struggle to hide their confusion and might as well hang a sign around their neck, "I am with Stupid."

© 2011 Buzz Hill

No comments:

Post a Comment